GMO-Z.com

GMO-Z.com is presented under the name GMO-Z.com Securities (Thailand) Public Company Limited, with Thai securities accounts rather than a single uniform forex offering. The evidence separately lists Japanese, Hong Kong and UK legal entities, but does not map the Thai accounts to those entities. Company disclosures describe Cash Balance as prefunded, with buying power limited to deposited cash, and Credit Balance as securities financing with a stated 50% margin requirement and security-specific requirements that may change. Both disclose 0.065% internet commission or 0.300% for marketing-officer transactions or forced sales, plus 0.007% additional securities fees and 7% VAT on fees. The THB 5,000 minimum concerns E-Payment/ATS funding, not a universal initial capital requirement.

Settrade Streaming appears in the Thai funding workflow, alongside disclosed Conditional Order and DCA Order functions; this does not establish permission for external EAs or APIs. Our site's approved checks against official regulator registers matched GMO-Z.com Forex HK Limited to SFC licence AZE792 for leveraged foreign exchange trading, and ＧＭＯクリック証券株式会社 to Japanese registration 関東財務局長(金商)第77号 for Type I, Type II and securities-related business. These checks establish named-entity registration evidence, not authorization for every offering under the brand. The checked UK record for GMO-Z.COM TRADE UK LIMITED, number 622897, is recorded as inactive with an end date of 19 July 2023 and no observed permissions. The Japanese record for 株式会社ＦＸプライムｂｙＧＭＯ remains pending verification; that entity is recorded as dissolved on 4 September 2023.

The central unresolved issue is which entity contracts with Thai customers and what registration and customer protections apply to that contract: no Thai licence record is supplied. Regulator-level protection indicators cannot establish account-level segregation, negative-balance protection or compensation eligibility across entities. Current Credit Balance collateral requirements, the complete currency policy and external automation permissions also remain incompletely established. The evidence supports specific company-disclosed terms and independently checked registrations for named entities, but not a reliable overall interpretation of the Thai offering's institutional safeguards. This information gap is not evidence of misconduct, poor execution or failed withdrawals; the overall conclusion is insufficient data.